Monday, December 31, 2007
Happy New Year 2008!!
I wish a very happy and prosperous new year -2008 to all of you who read my blog. I hope we will be able to see and feel peace all around us. May God bless you a lot.
Bhutan: Where is real democracy?
New Delhi, 31 December 2007
Today Bhutan is holding its first real voting to elect members to a new upper house of parliament, the National Council. This is indeed a historic day for the Bhutanese people and for the world as well, as democracy will be established in yet another corner of this restive world.
In December 2006, the Bhutanese King Jigme Singye Wangchuk handed over rein to his 26-year-old Oxford educated son Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck. The world hailed this act as the sunrise of democracy in this tiny secluded Himalayan country. But to some quarters this was sham. The New Delhi- based Asian Centre for Human Rights dismissed the socalled transition as “a royal family affair” as this by itself does not promise any democratic reform in the country unless the new King is committed to protecting and promoting human rights of all the citizens without any discrimination.
But the new King, like his father, refused to accept its over 100,000 Bhutanese citizens of Nepali origin who have been languishing as refugees in Nepal in miserable conditions after they fled or were expelled from the country in 1991 for protesting against discrimination and demanding democracy. Any true democracy must be inclusive. But the elections have not included those people who have risen against their king demanding democracy.
Although political parties were allowed registration, there is no political freedom in Bhutan. The government of Bhutan continues to consider all its political dissidents/ protestors as “Ngolop”, anti-nationals.
In a booklet released on 4 October 2007, the Druk National Congress, the opposition in exile, alleged that “Bhutan today is governed as per the King’s wishes, and the day to day official activities of the administration varies according to his personal interests. It is not only the general public, but also government servants who are affected by the King’s nepotism and favoritism.”
The Draft Constitution of Bhutan provides for a two-party system. But any number of political parties can contest the elections in the preliminary rounds and only the two largest vote winning parties can vie for the seats in the final rounds of elections. Between the two parties, the one winning the highest seats will form the government while the other will sit in the opposition.
But the Election Commission of Bhutan effectively ensured that only two parties were registered to contest the general elections to be held in early 2008 by disqualifying the Bhutan People’s United Party on 27 November 2007. Only two political parties - People’s Democratic Party’s (PDP) headed by former Prime Minister Sangay Ngedup; and Druk Phuensum Tshogpa (DPT) headed by former Home Minister Jigmi Y Thinley – have been recognized by the Election Commission to contest the first Parliamentary elections. Both PDP and DPT are king’s supporters. It has been alleged that the Bhutan People’s United Party was denied registration because its leaders do not enjoy support from the king.
Today Bhutan is holding its first real voting to elect members to a new upper house of parliament, the National Council. This is indeed a historic day for the Bhutanese people and for the world as well, as democracy will be established in yet another corner of this restive world.
In December 2006, the Bhutanese King Jigme Singye Wangchuk handed over rein to his 26-year-old Oxford educated son Jigme Khesar Namgyel Wangchuck. The world hailed this act as the sunrise of democracy in this tiny secluded Himalayan country. But to some quarters this was sham. The New Delhi- based Asian Centre for Human Rights dismissed the socalled transition as “a royal family affair” as this by itself does not promise any democratic reform in the country unless the new King is committed to protecting and promoting human rights of all the citizens without any discrimination.
But the new King, like his father, refused to accept its over 100,000 Bhutanese citizens of Nepali origin who have been languishing as refugees in Nepal in miserable conditions after they fled or were expelled from the country in 1991 for protesting against discrimination and demanding democracy. Any true democracy must be inclusive. But the elections have not included those people who have risen against their king demanding democracy.
Although political parties were allowed registration, there is no political freedom in Bhutan. The government of Bhutan continues to consider all its political dissidents/ protestors as “Ngolop”, anti-nationals.
In a booklet released on 4 October 2007, the Druk National Congress, the opposition in exile, alleged that “Bhutan today is governed as per the King’s wishes, and the day to day official activities of the administration varies according to his personal interests. It is not only the general public, but also government servants who are affected by the King’s nepotism and favoritism.”
The Draft Constitution of Bhutan provides for a two-party system. But any number of political parties can contest the elections in the preliminary rounds and only the two largest vote winning parties can vie for the seats in the final rounds of elections. Between the two parties, the one winning the highest seats will form the government while the other will sit in the opposition.
But the Election Commission of Bhutan effectively ensured that only two parties were registered to contest the general elections to be held in early 2008 by disqualifying the Bhutan People’s United Party on 27 November 2007. Only two political parties - People’s Democratic Party’s (PDP) headed by former Prime Minister Sangay Ngedup; and Druk Phuensum Tshogpa (DPT) headed by former Home Minister Jigmi Y Thinley – have been recognized by the Election Commission to contest the first Parliamentary elections. Both PDP and DPT are king’s supporters. It has been alleged that the Bhutan People’s United Party was denied registration because its leaders do not enjoy support from the king.
Friday, December 28, 2007
Benazir Bhutto's assassination......
The assassination of Mrs Benazir Bhutto by a suicide bomber (Al Queda has reportedly owned up responsibility) during an election rally in Rawalpindi once again proves that the Islamic terrorists continue to rule the roost in Pakistan, although the Pakistani President Pervaz Musharraf would reiterate that Pakistan would not be bowed down by terrorism. Suggestions and suspicions over the “real” possible mastermind of the attack on Bhutto are running fast and furious. But it will be never likely that the real culprit is identified and punished.
Although Musharraf himself is under threats from the terrorists, he is largely to blame for the current state of affairs. Mush has been one of the most important allies of the US in the global war against terrorism, but it has been now exposed as to how he “diverted” US $ 5 bn of the US military aid to engage in war with arch rival India instead of fighting the terrorists. The fruits of his appeasement and resilience on the terrorists are well before him and the world. But does President Musharraf still think that India still is a bigger enemy than the terrorism?
Although Musharraf himself is under threats from the terrorists, he is largely to blame for the current state of affairs. Mush has been one of the most important allies of the US in the global war against terrorism, but it has been now exposed as to how he “diverted” US $ 5 bn of the US military aid to engage in war with arch rival India instead of fighting the terrorists. The fruits of his appeasement and resilience on the terrorists are well before him and the world. But does President Musharraf still think that India still is a bigger enemy than the terrorism?
Thursday, December 27, 2007
Machang Lalung, heard of him?
New Delhi, 27 December 2007
When Sachin Tendulkar scores a half-century, he becomes a headline in almost all important newspapers and other news media. But what about some one who has spent over half-a-century in jail without trial in court? Yes, that was Assam’s Machang Lalung who spent 54 precious years of his life in jail without being produced in court. But hardly many people had heard of him!! Not many newspapers gave a space to cover his pitiful story! Serious journalism, hee??
When this morning I read in the Telegraph , Kolkata about the death of Lalung at his native village in Assam on the Christmas day (25 December 2007), I felt bad for some time. He was just beginning to start his life afresh after being released from jail (mental prison) in July 2005 on a token personal bond of Re 1 after the intervention of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). The NHRC discovered him in the Tezpur mental hospital while taking stock of the state of the undertrials in the state.
He was imprisoned for allegedly killing a person in a fit of rage. But that is not the story is really about. His story is about the injustice done to him in jail. He stands as a symbol of this great country's blatant failures to deliver speedy justice to the under trials. Speedy justice is a different thing in the case of Lalung. He was not even accorded a trial to prove his innocence or guilt. Certainly, fair trial is the basis for any true democratic society.
It is not Lalung alone, for sure. There are hundreds in this country a precious part of those lives are snatched ..... without trials.
After release, Lalung almost became a hero for his villagers and government babus continued to visit him. The government had promised Lalung many things, including a house to be built for him but did not fulfill. He was merely paid Rs 3 lakhs as compensation for being illegally detained for over a half century and in a mental hospital, although the doctors long back declared him fit for trial (In India trial of mentally ill prisoners is not allowed by law). He was reduced to such a state that he failed to recognize even his close relatives.
When Sachin Tendulkar scores a half-century, he becomes a headline in almost all important newspapers and other news media. But what about some one who has spent over half-a-century in jail without trial in court? Yes, that was Assam’s Machang Lalung who spent 54 precious years of his life in jail without being produced in court. But hardly many people had heard of him!! Not many newspapers gave a space to cover his pitiful story! Serious journalism, hee??
When this morning I read in the Telegraph , Kolkata about the death of Lalung at his native village in Assam on the Christmas day (25 December 2007), I felt bad for some time. He was just beginning to start his life afresh after being released from jail (mental prison) in July 2005 on a token personal bond of Re 1 after the intervention of the National Human Rights Commission (NHRC). The NHRC discovered him in the Tezpur mental hospital while taking stock of the state of the undertrials in the state.
He was imprisoned for allegedly killing a person in a fit of rage. But that is not the story is really about. His story is about the injustice done to him in jail. He stands as a symbol of this great country's blatant failures to deliver speedy justice to the under trials. Speedy justice is a different thing in the case of Lalung. He was not even accorded a trial to prove his innocence or guilt. Certainly, fair trial is the basis for any true democratic society.
It is not Lalung alone, for sure. There are hundreds in this country a precious part of those lives are snatched ..... without trials.
After release, Lalung almost became a hero for his villagers and government babus continued to visit him. The government had promised Lalung many things, including a house to be built for him but did not fulfill. He was merely paid Rs 3 lakhs as compensation for being illegally detained for over a half century and in a mental hospital, although the doctors long back declared him fit for trial (In India trial of mentally ill prisoners is not allowed by law). He was reduced to such a state that he failed to recognize even his close relatives.
Wednesday, December 26, 2007
welcome
Welcome to my blog.
This is the first thing I thought of doing on the eve of New Year -2008. Hopefully, I will be sharing with you all the details of my thoughts in this forum.
This is the first thing I thought of doing on the eve of New Year -2008. Hopefully, I will be sharing with you all the details of my thoughts in this forum.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Book: Chittagong Hill Tracts The Secret History of its award to Pakistan in 1947
I have the pleasure to inform about my latest book, "Chittagong Hill Tracts: The Secret History of its Award to Pakistan in 1947"....
