Saturday, November 16, 2019

Book Review: Chakmas: Indigenous Peoples of Mizoram

BOOK REVIEW:

Chakmas: Indigenous Peoples of Mizoram by Paritosh Chakma






This book, for the first time, challenges the traditional narrative on the Chakmas of Mizoram and their history, largely created by the Mizo scholars, which the author has described as "false narrative." The existing popular narrative claims that Chakmas of Mizoram are not indigenous to Mizoram but had come to Lushai soil as "coolies" of the British during Lushai Expedition of 1871-72. This book, however, claims that it is the other way round, that is, it was the Chakmas who had invited the Kukis, precursors of Mizos, to their land to fight the British in 1777 AD. The book traces the settlement of the Chakmas prior to the Kukis/Mizos in the western frontier of the state and digs out convincing historical facts to establish the Chakma-lived territories of Mizoram as being part of Chakma kingdom (or what the British called 'Chakma Circle') till April 1898.

If you are interested on the book, do order it NOW from:









Saturday, November 2, 2019

History of the Chakmas: Descendants of Sakya


History of the Chakmas: Descendants of Sakya

The Chakmas belong to Tibeto-Mongoloid race, just like the Mizos and majority tribes of the Northeast, but speak a language which is Indo-European. They are one the rarest tribal groups having their own script called Ajha Path which has been found to be closely linked to the Burmese scripts. The community is divided into 46 gozas (clans).

The history of the Chakmas is obscure. They are the descendents of the Sakya race to which Lord Buddha belonged. Some centuries before Lord Buddha was born, a Sakya king/prince named Abhi Raja had left Kapilavastu on the foothills of the Himalayas (in present-day Nepal) and founded the Tagaung kingdom, the first Burmese kingdom, on the banks of Irrawaddy in Upper Burma. Burmese histories namely Maha Rajaweng (or, Great History of Kings) and The Glass Palace Chronicle of the Kings of Burma confirm the arrival of this Sakya king/prince from Kapilavastu. The Burmese chronicles handed down names of three original tribes namely Kanran, Pyu or Pru, and Sak or Thek. Sir Arthur P. Phayre, former Chief Commissioner of British Burma and authority on the Burmese history, opined that “The last [Sak/Thek], however, is not an original native term, but probably an abbreviation of Sakya, and may have been retained by at least a portion of the earliest Indian settlers and their descendants for some time”. A few centuries later and a few years before the death of Lord Buddha, another migration of Sakyas to Burma occurred, this time under the leadership of prince Daza Raja. Both these two great migrations happened because of murderous attacks on Kapilavastu by the ruler of Kosala, a powerful kingdom in north India. Sakyas’ pride which did not allow to marry off their pure-blood women outside the community was responsible for these attacks on them. The second attack had brought near total annihilation of the Sakyas as Kosala king Virudabha had ordered massacre of every Sakya including infants to avenge deceit committed by the Sakyas upon his father, Pasenadi or Prasenajit. King Prasenajit wanted to marry a Sakya princess but the notorious Sakyas thought it beneath their dignity to marry off a pure-blooded Sakya princess to anybody outside their clan. Therefore, Sakya raja Mahanama, a cousin of the Buddha, deceitfully sent his illegitimate daughter Vasabha, born from a slave-woman called Nagamunda, whom king Prasenajit married and Queen Vasabha gave birth to a son named Virudabha. Sir Phayre claimed that the modern Burma race are descendants of Sakyas who had migrated to the valley of Irrawaddy from Kapilavastu.

According to Pamela Gutman, the Saks ruled the Central Burma in the 9th century while the Burmans (Mranma) ruled the plains. The Saks were a powerful and fearful nation but for some reasons they further migrated to Arakan in very ancient times. They had attained “a higher cultural level than any of the other minority peoples in Arakan.” Their descendents, the Loi conquered people of Manipur.

Reading a chapter from Paritosh's "Chakmas: Indigenous Peoples of Mizoram"


The period of migration of the Saks, who came to be known as Chakma in modern sense, to their present territory in the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) and adjoining parts of Mizoram is not accurately known. But their Arakanese roots are beyond any doubt. All modern historians-scholars tend to agree that at some point of time the Chakmas had lived in Arakan where they are still known as “Daingnets”. Captain TH Lewin stated, “Whatever opinion may be formed of the primal origin of the Thek, or Chukma tribe, no doubt can exist as to their having been at one time inhabitants of the province of Arracan, from whence they have migrated to these hills (Chittagong Hill Tracts).” H.H.S. Hutchinson held that “The Chakmas are undoubtedly of Arakanese origin.  They immigrated into the Chittagong District where they intermarried largely with the Bengalis, whose language they speak.” According to H.H. Risley, “The evidence at present available does not appear to warrant any more definite conclusion than that the Chakmas are probably a people of Arakanese origin, whose physical type has been to some extent modified by intermarriage with Bengali settlers.” Satish Chandra also held the opinion that “That at one point of time they had lived in the Arakan there is no doubt about it. They have been using the scripts imitated (from Arakanese) since then.” Dr Francis Buchanan and B.H. Hodgson also called the Thek (Chakma) “aboriginal” of Arakan.

The Saks (also spelt as Tsak) were also known to the Burmese as “Thet” or “Thek” as the Burmese sometimes pronounced “S” as “Th”. The name “Chakma” is a modern appellation of the tribe name “Sak”. As Lewin stated, “The names of Chukma, Tsak, Thek, and Doingnak, may all therefore be taken as names representing the (Chakma) tribe”. Risley also identified the Chakma as Tsakma, Tsak, and Thek. In 1798, Dr Buchanan stated that “the Sak are the same people with those, who in the Northern parts of the province are called Sakma, or Chakmas.” Dr Buchanan further mentioned, “They call themselves Saksa, which word corrupted has, I suppose, given rise to their Bengalese name Sagma or Chakma.”

In Burmese, “tha” or “tsa” means “son”. Therefore, the literal translation of “Saksa” would be “son of Sak”. Since “Chakma” has been derived from “Saksa”, the accurate meaning of “CHAKMA” is “CHILDREN OF SAKYA”. Or, in other words, they are the descendants of the Sakya tribe to which Lord Buddha himself belonged. Chakmas still call themselves “Sakma” or “Sangma”.

Sadly, the Chakmas do not have a written history. They, however, have carried an oral tradition till today which claims that they are the descendents of Sakya who had ruled a legendary kingdom called “Champaknagar” whose location has yet to be accurately identified. Oral traditions of Chakmas say a prince of Champaknagar named Bijoygiri marched southwards to conquer parts of Chittagong and Arakan with the help of his military commander Radhaman. When he decided to return home after the victorious expedition, news about the death of his aged father and usurpation of the throne by his younger brother Samargiri reached him. Prince Bijoygiri was against the idea of bowing down to his younger sibling who was now the king, and hence decided to settle in the conquered land with his army. Bijoygiri had snapped all the communications with Champaknagar and its people who sank into the oblivion and the modern Chakmas are believed to be the descendants of Bijoygiri and his dewans (chiefs). In 1909, Hutchinson termed the Bijoygiri story as “a myth” but Risley had opined in 1892 that Bijoygiri had invaded the Chittagong Hill Tracts (CHT) about the end of the 14th century. The Chakmas strongly believe that Demagiri (now in Mizoram) abutting the hills of CHT was founded by Chakma prince Bijoygiri.

(Excerpts from Chakmas: Indigenous Peoples of Mizoram, by Paritosh Chakma, ISBN: 978-93-5382-993-3, Price: Rs. 699 INR, Pages: 148)

To buy the book, please click HERE


Saturday, October 12, 2019

Buy: "Chakmas: Indigenous Peoples of Mizoram" by Paritosh Chakma.




"Chakmas: Indigenous Peoples of Mizoram" by Paritosh Chakma.

Now available for purchase!







About the book: 

This is the first-ever book on the "Chakmas" of Mizoram (India) exploring the history of their ancient settlement in the western belt of this tiny northeastern state of India, bordering Bangladesh. The book answers both historical and contemporary questions that have been lingering in the minds of the general public, politicians, academicians and activists both in and outside of Mizoram about the indigeneity of the Chakma tribe and their settlement in the state, and other issues.

The book is indispensable for anyone who is interested to know about the Chakmas of Mizoram. It is remarkable for its originality and in-dept research on the subject.

Price: INR 699/-
Pages: 148
ISBN: 978-93-5382-993-3
Publisher: Self-published by the author
Year of publication: 2019

The book is now available for purchase across India. To purchase, kindly contact the author via Email: pari.mizoram@gmail.com

Facebook Page: https://www.facebook.com/ParitoshChakmaOfficial/

NOTE: Buyer's address should be serviceable by "Speed Post" of India Post


Friday, July 26, 2019

Monday, July 15, 2019

Supreme Court dismisses Mizoram Government’s SLP in STEE Case


15 July 2019

PRESS RELEASE

Supreme Court dismisses Mizoram’s SLP, Mizoram must not commit contempt of court
New Delhi: The All India Chakma Students’ Union (AICSU) has welcomed the Supreme Court’s dismissal of the Special Leave Petition filed by the Government of Mizoram against the judgment of the Guahati High Court in PIL No. 49/2016 (popularly known as “STEE Case”) in the Mizoram Chakma Students Union Vs State of Mizoram.

Today, a Supreme Court bench headed by Justice S A Bobde observed that the judgment of the Guahati High Court dated 22.2.2019 in PIL No. 49/2016 was such a well-reasoned judgment that it required no interference and dismissed the SLP(C) No. 014537/2019 filed by the Mizoram Government.

Vide its judgement dated 22.2.2019, the Gauhati High Court quashed the Mizoram (Selection of Candidates for Higher Technical Courses) Rules, 2016 notified in the gazette on 22.04.2016 which put the “Zo-ethnic people” (Mizos) under Category-I and “non-Zo ethnic people” under Category-II and further reserved 95% seats for Category I, 4% seats for Category II and 1% seats for Category-III (Children of non-permanent residents of Mizoram). The Mizoram Chakma Students’ Union (MCSU) challenged the constitutional validity of this Rule.

The Gauhati High Court held that “the impugned Rule placing children of non-Zo-ethnic people of the State of Mizoram in Category-II cannot be sustained. It is further observed that they have to be placed along with Zo-ethnic people of the State of Mizoram.”

However, on 8th July 2019, the State Government of Mizoram stated that in the allotment of medical seats to students selected through the National Eligibility Entrance Test (NEET) this year, Category-I would be reserved only for “Zo ethnic people” (Mizos).

“We heartily welcome the dismissal of the Special Leave Petition filed by the Mizoram Government. If the State of Mizoram violates the judgment of the Gauhati High Court in view of the Supreme Court’s latest order, it shall be considered as contempt of the court”- stated Mr Dilip Kanti Chakma, president of the All India Chakma Students Union (AICSU).



Saturday, March 30, 2019

Chakma Council Chief rejects MZP version as “purely concocted and misleading”


On 28th March 2019, a news report appeared in media, including The Mizoram Post, Vanglaini, and Eastmojo, which published the alleged version of the Mizo Zirlai Pawl, a students body, regarding the private discussions held between the MZP and the Chakma Autonomous District Council chief Mr Rashik Mohan Chakma at CADC headquarters Kamalanagar, in Southern Mizoram on 27th March.

“During an interaction with leaders of Mizo Zirlai Pawl (MZP) at Chawngte in south Mizoram's Lawngtlai district bordering Bangladesh, Chakma said there are some illegal villages in the CADC area and the government will make concerted effort with the MZP to demolish them.”, Eastmojo and The Mizoram Post reported.

The Mizoram Post, 28.3.2019


But Mr Rashik Mohan Chakma refuted the MZP’s version as reported in the media. A press statement released by Mizo National Front, Youth Wing, on behalf of Mr Rashik Mohan Chakma on 28th March 2019 rejected the MZP’s version as appeared in the media as “purely concocted and misleading”.

Press Release by MNF, Youth Front dt 28.3.2019
The Mizoram Post, 30.3.2019


Eastmojo also reported on 30th March 2019:

"Denouncing such reports as “purely concocted and misleading,” Rasik Mohan Chakma asserted that the media had misreported about the proceeding of the meeting and misquoted him on illegal villages issue, the statement added. “I refute these mala fide and mischievous out of context reports attributed to me in the newspapers”, Chakma was quoted as saying."
Earlier, on 13 March 2019, while responding to question from opposition Congress MLA KT Rokhaw, Minister of district council and minority affairs R Lalzirliana told the Assembly House that “No unauthorised villages have been established by illegal immigrants from Bangladesh in Chakma area since the formation of the new government.”

Hence, the question now is, will the Chakma Council Chief and Chakma leaders trust MZP anymore and will be willing to hold discussions with them since facts were allegedly distorted and put out in the media to mislead the people?


Book: Chittagong Hill Tracts The Secret History of its award to Pakistan in 1947

I have the pleasure to inform about my latest book, "Chittagong Hill Tracts: The Secret History of its Award to Pakistan in 1947"....